The New York Times recently described the newest developments in France to enact a prohibition on the wearing of the face veil. Some of the opposition of course came from religious groups. Meanwhile, as Miguel Schor has pointed out in a recent blog posting here, Argentina has essentially allowed same-sex marriage. Again, religious groups led the opposition. These are both victories for some notion of secularism, in the views of many. Yet it’s intriguing to think of the very different concepts of equality implicated by this secularism. In Argentina, one sees an equality as diversity approach. In France, one sees equality as a kind of homogeneity. These different notions of equality have been discussed by many scholars, but it is intriguing to see the divide in practice at the same time.
Veiled Equality and Secularism.
Latest
Landmark Ruling Issued by the Special Highest Court of Greece: Annulment of Parliamentary Seats without Replacement
Reimagining Constitutional Equality: Indigenous Governance, Vulnerability, and the Legacy of Dickson v. Vuntut Gwitchin First Nation
Can a Policy with an Impossible Aim be Legitimate and Necessary? France’s “Abolitionist” Policy in M.A. and Others v. France
What’s New in Public Law
Trump v. CASA, Inc. – The Latest Step in the Undoing of American Democracy
Most Read
Constitutional Court Appointments and Acting Presidents in South Korea: The Messy Aftermath of the Yoon Impeachment
What’s New in Public Law
What’s New in Public Law
Clarifying Gubernatorial Powers in the Legislative Process: The Indian Supreme Court’s Judgment in State of Tamil Nadu v. Governor of Tamil Nadu
Bangladesh’s Apolitical Constitution-making Initiative: Silver Lining or Slippery Slope?
Comments