Blog of the International Journal of Constitutional Law

Cote d’Ivoire’s Constitutional Council invalidates election results

Per the wire feed carried by the New York Times, Cote d’Ivoire’s Conseil Constitutionnel has just overturned the election commission’s conclusion that the opposition candidate won the country’s presidential election, and has instead handed victory to the incumbent president Laurent Gbagbo. The Times article notes that the election results reported by the election commission had been found credible by the African Union and the United Nations. Indeed, the U.N. Secretary-General’s special representative in Cote d’Ivoire has denounced the Conseil Constitutionnel’s actions in this case.

According to both the Prime Minister’s official webpage (in French) and French Wikipedia, the Conseil Constitutionnel is supposed to consist of a President, two Vice-Presidents, and six councillors, ***all appointed by the President***. In addition, former Presidents (of the country, not the constitutional council) are life members. Its mandate includes ensuring the regularity of elections and referenda.

It is not difficult to understand why a president might want a judicial body consisting almost entirely of his own appointees to decide whether he has won re-election, or why such a body might take liberties with the actual election results. The Conseil Constitutionnel does not seem to be contributing much in the way of checks and balances, it would seem.


2 responses to “Cote d’Ivoire’s Constitutional Council invalidates election results”

  1. Raul Sanchez Urribarri Avatar
    Raul Sanchez Urribarri

    Thanks, David. This is important (and ongoing) news. This just in:

    I wonder if anybody has written recently about French-inspired Constitutional Councils in Western and Northern Africa. I remember reading some time ago about the Mauritarian Constitutional Council (which, by the way, seems at least occasionally active, see

  2. David Law Avatar

    Thanks for the update Raul. If this isn’t the worst thing that a body entrusted with upholding the constitution can do, surely it must be close. Interesting to read the suggestion that a majority of soldiers voted for the opposition candidate. Perhaps a coup d’etat will not be far behind.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *