Readers of this space will recall our previous commentary on the Honduran referendum scheduled for today. The question on the ballot was whether or not to rewrite the Honduran constitution. Critics had suggested that the primary motivation for the constitutional replacement was an extension of President Zelaya’s term in office. Whatever the motivation, the results are in. The military, it seems, had the most influential (and only) vote: before the polls opened this morning, the military swept into the presidential palace, deposed the president, and engineered the selection of his replacement by the legislature. All in defense of the constitution, according to a statement by the Honduran Supreme Court. The constitution, it appears, has “survived.”
A Short Referendum in Honduras
Latest
What’s New in Public Law
Comparative Constitutional Law and the Problem of “Context”
Queer Freedom and the Limits of Law: Lessons from For Women Scotland Ltd v. The Scottish Ministers
What’s New in Public Law
What’s New in Public Law
Most Read
South Korean Constitutional Court Upholds Impeachment of President Yoon for Abusing Emergency Power
Constitutional Court Appointments and Acting Presidents in South Korea: The Messy Aftermath of the Yoon Impeachment
What’s New in Public Law
What’s New in Public Law
Bangladesh’s Apolitical Constitution-making Initiative: Silver Lining or Slippery Slope?
Comments