Following last week’s general elections in Thailand, the losing Democrat Party has asked Thailand’s Constitutional Court to dissolve the winning Pheu Thai party. Thailand’s Constitutional Court, like a number of other specialized constitutional courts (e.g., Germany, South Korea, Taiwan, Turkey), has the constitutional power and responsibility to rule upon the lawfulness of political parties (per Part 13, Section 68 of the 2007 Constitution). Pheu Thai is headed by the sister of Thaksin Shinawatra, who was deposed in a military coup in 2006. The coup leaders also adopted a new constitution and reconstituted the Constitutional Court, which proceeded to rule Thaksin Shinawatra’s People’s Power Party illegal and is the same institution that is now being asked to rule Shinawatra’s sister’s party illegal as well.
The constitutionalization of Thai political turmoil should come as no surprise to readers of this blog. As Tom put it in an earlier post, “to predict constitutional instability in Thailand is like predicting snow in Chicago in winter.”
Thailand’s Constitutional Court to consider legality of ruling party
Latest
Trump v. CASA, Inc. – The Latest Step in the Undoing of American Democracy
Safeguarding the Rule of Law: The European Public Prosecutor Office’s Role and Challenges
The Relaunch of Constitutional Studies
What’s New in Public Law
What’s New in Public Law
Most Read
Constitutional Court Appointments and Acting Presidents in South Korea: The Messy Aftermath of the Yoon Impeachment
What’s New in Public Law
What’s New in Public Law
What’s New in Public Law
Clarifying Gubernatorial Powers in the Legislative Process: The Indian Supreme Court’s Judgment in State of Tamil Nadu v. Governor of Tamil Nadu
Comments