—Jonathon Penney, Dalhousie University and University of Oxford Constitutional “dialogue” used to be the fashion in Canadian legal circles. From the late 1990s to mid-to-late 2000s, legal scholars engaged in contentious debates on the topic and the Supreme Court of Canada itself invoked the metaphor in a series of judgments to describe, and theorize, the relationship between the Court and
Welcome to I·CONnect: the blog of the International Journal of Constitutional Law.
A letter from the Editor-in-Chief of I·CON
Welcome message from Tom Ginsburg
Editorial Director, I·CON: J. H. H. Weiler
Editors, I·CONnect: Richard Albert, Antonia Baraggia, Tom Ginsburg, and David Landau, Jaclyn Neo
I·CONnect does not take positions on substantive issues or conflicts, instead allowing our diverse community to debate issues in substantive posts. I·CONnect allows appeals and public statements only on issues that affect the entire community of comparative public law scholars.
IberICONnect EJIL: Talk!
