I·CONnect

—Richard Albert, The University of Texas at Austin

Oxford University Press has created an exciting Series in Comparative Constitutionalism, a new home for scholarly books in public law focused on the study of constitutionalism. The new Series is co-edited by Robert Schütze and me.

Robert and I are delighted to announce that we have contracted our first three books in the Series, one each to be authored separately by Ran Hirschl (Toronto), Bui Ngoc Son (NUS), and Wojciech Sadurski (Sydney).

The new Series welcomes complete proposals as well as preliminary inquiries. A proposal should include a working title, a narrative exposition of the ideas to be developed, a detailed table of contents, a chapter-by-chapter description of the ground you will cover, and a discussion of the competing and related scholarship. A proposal should also include an anticipated manuscript delivery date, an estimated word count, and an indication of the percentage of the book that will have been published elsewhere, for instance in a legal periodical. Ultimately, a proposal should situate your claim(s) within the existing literature and explain the scholarly contribution you will make in your book. A curriculum vitae and two draft chapters from your proposed book will also assist in the consideration of your proposal. For any formal or informal inquiries please contact the Series editors by email at richard.albert [at] law.utexas.edu and robert.schuetze [at] durham.ac.uk or OUP commissioning editor Jamie Berezin at jamie.berezin [at] oup.com.

The mission of this new Series is to publish public law scholarship of the highest caliber by scholars of all academic ranks. The series is, above all, comparative in nature: we aim to publish outstanding monographs (and on exceptional occasions edited collections) that enrich our comparative understanding of constitutional doctrine, norms, practices, or systems. The series’ comparative focus on the study of constitutionalism does not foreclose single-jurisdiction studies. The series, importantly, takes a broad view of what is constitutional: instead of the classic focus on the nation state, we consciously wish to integrate local, national, regional, and global phenomena into its scope. We aspire to feature the very best doctrinal, historical, sociological, and theoretical inquiries within this domain of comparative constitutionalism.

The new Series is supported by an Advisory Board of six scholars representing the richness and diversity of our field: Denis Baranger (Paris II), Wen-Chen Chang (NTU), Roberto Gargarella (Torcuato di Tella), Vicki Jackson (Harvard), Christoph Möllers (Humboldt) and Cheryl Saunders (Melbourne).

We look forward to receiving your book proposals.

—Emese Pásztor, Assistant Professor of Law, ELTE, with contributions from PhD students Bazánth Barbara, Renáta Bedő, Ádám Lukonits, and János Mécs

The Central and Eastern European Regional Chapter of the International Society of Public Law (ICON-S CEE) was established on 19 April 2018 in Budapest, Hungary. Following the establishment period, the chapter will be open for scholars of any nationality based at universities in Central and Eastern Europe and scholars of nationality of one of the Central and Eastern European countries, as well as other scholars interested in CEE who would like to join as members. (If you are interested in the work of the chapter, please contact us at iconceechapter@gmail.com).

The establishment of the ICON-S CEE chapter was announced at the inaugural conference on 20 April 2018. The conference, convened by Eszter Bodnár (ELTE), David Kosař (Masaryk University), Zoltán Pozsár-Szentmiklósy (ELTE) and Pál Sonnevend (ELTE), was hosted by the Eötvös Loránd University Faculty of Law (ELTE) in Budapest.

The conference, entitled ‘The Power of Public Law in the 21^st century’ provided an exceptional opportunity for the participants to dedicate an entire day solely to the noble mission of evaluating current European trends in the field of public law, and to continue all the discussions that have started at earlier events convened by ICON-S.

Read the rest of this entry…

—Gaurav Mukherjee, S.J.D. Candidate in Comparative Constitutional Law, Central European University, Budapest

In this weekly feature, I-CONnect publishes a curated reading list of developments in public law. “Developments” may include a selection of links to news, high court decisions, new or recent scholarly books and articles, and blog posts from around the public law blogosphere.

To submit relevant developments for our weekly feature on “What’s New in Public Law,” please email contact.iconnect@gmail.com.

Developments in Constitutional Courts

1. The Supreme Court of India concluded the second longest oral arguments in the Court’s history–the case challenging the constitutionality of the Aadhar system of biometric information based unique identification. Critics of the Aadhar cite irregularities in the legislative procedure used to pass the law, as well as its impact on privacy rights of Indian citizens.
2. The Supreme Court of The Gambia issued a landmark judgment declaring that laws on sedition, false publication and broadcasting are constitutional and should would remain on the statute books, much to the disappointment of the civil society groups who had challenged them as endangering freedom of the press. Further analysis available here.
3. The Supreme Court of India ordered a floor test to ascertain whether the Bharatiya Janata Party, the party in power at the federal had the requisite numeric strength to form government in the southern state of Karnataka.
4. The U.K. Supreme Court will hear arguments about U.K. government hacking for the first time, as a public-interest group seeks to challenge a decision permitting the government to collect large amounts of personal data and communications.
5. The U.S. Supreme Court rejected a claim seeking clarification on whether second amendment gun rights extended to sellers of firearms.
6. The Federal Constitutional Court of Germany heard oral arguments in a case concerning Rundfunkbeitrag (broadcasting contribution) in order to determine whether the payment is constitutional.
7. The Supreme Court of Canada ruled that a Quebec law delaying pay equity for women in female-dominated workplaces violated Charter equality rights but declined to strike the law down. Full judgment available here.
8. The U.S. Supreme Court held that the Sixth Amendment guarantees a defendant the right to choose the objective of his defense and to insist that his counsel refrain from admitting guilt, even when counsel’s experienced-based view is that confessing guilt offers the defendant the best chance to avoid the death penalty. Full judgment here.
9. The High Court of Australia delivered its judgment in a case concerning the qualifications for parliamentarians who hold dual citizenship.
10. The U.S. Supreme Court struck down the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act as violating the Constitution’s anti-commandeering rule. Full judgment here.
11. The Supreme Court of Canada signalled its intention to once again consider the nature and scope of judicial review of administrative action, specifically the question of standard of review. The decision granting leave to appeal can be found here.
12. The Supreme Court of Canada declined to hear the appeal of an Egyptian man who is being deported by federal authorities after being accused of having links to terrorist organizations.
13. The High Court of Australia dismissed appeal petitions by South East Asian refugees from the Supreme Court of Nauru, stating that they could find residence other parts of their homeland that were less dangerous.
14. The Constitutional Court of Moldova examined the constitutionality of certain normative provisions on the scope of judicial review made by the supreme court of justice with respect to decisions of the superior council of magistrates.
15. The Constitutional Court of Moldova examined the constitutionality of certain provisions of the criminal code on to the use of fake documents of particular importance

In the News

1. Burundi voted in a referendum on 17 May to express their views on a range of constitutional amendments, the outcome of which could have an impact on issues ranging from term limits to ethnic minority protections. More coverage here.
2. The Consultative Council of European Judges, CCJE, a Council of Europe advisory body on issues relating to the independence and competence of judges, supported Serbian judges in their criticisms of proposed changes to the constitution, the head of the Serbian judges’ association.
3. Maria Lourdes Sereno, the Chief Justice of the Philippines Supreme Court and a vocal critic of Prime Minister Duterte’s actions, was ousted from her office by her fellow judges, in a move being termed as a threat to democracy by protesters.
4. Pakistan’s parliament passed the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, a landmark law that seeks to expand fundamental rights for the country’s transgender community and will allow transgender people to be officially recognized as their preferred gender for the first time. Full text of law available here.
5. In Somalia, representatives from the Federal Member States, civil society and private citizens took part in the launch of the National Constitutional Convention as part of its constitutional review process.
6. The Supreme Court of Canada placed a 50-year embargo on public access to files related to the deliberations of the judges, from the time they rule on a case, which has ensured that documents disclosing their secret inner workings will not be revealed during their lifetime.
7. In Zimbabwe, Opposition leader Elton Mangoma petitioned the Constitutional Court seeking an order to nullify sections of the Electoral Act as well as align others with the Constitution ahead of the setting of dates for the 2018 harmonized elections expected later this year.

New Scholarship

1. Cass R. Sunstein & Adrian Vermeule, The Morality of Administrative Law (2018) (offering a unifying theory of judge-made administrative law. They argue that Lon Fuller’s influential theory of internal legal morality––specifically, his eight ways that “legal rules may misfire,” such as retroactivity, vagueness, or unpredictability––explains many of the judicial anxieties that have helped shape modern administrative law doctrine)
2. Richard Albert & Bertil Oder, The Forms of Unamendability, in An Unamendable Constitution? Unamendability in Constitutional States (Richard Albert & Bertil Oder, eds., forthcoming Springer 2018) (introducing this edited volume and illustrating the many purposes served by unamendability in constitutional design)
3. Jared A. Goldstein, Unfit for the Constitution: Nativism and the Constitution, From The Founding Fathers To Donald Trump (2018) (tracing nativism as expressed in legislative and executive actions from the founding fathers of the U.S. to Donald Trump)
4. Grégoire Webber, et. al.(eds.), Legislated Rights. Securing Human Rights through Legislation (2018) (exploring how and why legislatures, being strategically placed within a system of positive law, can help realise human rights through modes of protection that courts cannot provide by way of judicial review)
5. Thorbjørn Jagland (Secretary General of the Council of Europe) released his report titled State of Democracy, Human Rights and The Rule Of Law. Role of institutions, Threats to institutions (2018) (assessing the key building blocks of democratic security across Council of Europe member states: independent judiciaries, freedom of expression, freedom of assembly and association, the functioning of democratic institutions and inclusive societies)
6. Maurice Adams, Anne Meuwese, and Ernst Hirsch Ballin (eds.), Constitutionalism and the Rule of Law. Bridging Idealism and Realism (2018) (presenting a set of essays to test the hypothesis that the best normative theories, including those regarding the role of constitutions, constitutionalism and the rule of law, conceive of the ideal and the real as mutually regulating)
7. Niels Petersen, Proportionality and Judicial Activism. Fundamental Rights Adjudication in Canada, Germany and South Africa (2018) (arguing that endogenous institutional constraints bind judges in the 3 jurisdictions under study from engaging in judicial activism)
8. Helen Carr, Brendan Edgeworth, Caroline Hunter, Law and the Precarious Home. Socio Legal Perspectives on the Home in Insecure Times (2018) (exploring the emergent and internationally widespread phenomenon of precariousness by applying innovative work done by socio-legal scholars in other fields such as labour law and welfare law, to the home)
9. Gabriel Negretto and Javier Couso, Constitution-Building Processes in Latin America (2018) (describing a number of successful strategies in relation to rights and government structure which has worked in countries in Latin America in the 1978-2012 period)
10. Bui Ngoc Son, Constitutional Mobilization (2018) (introducing the concept of constitutional mobilization, theorizing about it, and offering an original, empirical case-study)
11. Donal Coffey, Drafting the Irish Constitution, 1935–1937. Transnational Influences in Interwar Europe (2018) (situating the drafting of the Irish Constitution within broader transnational constitutional currents)

Call for Papers and Announcements

1. The Serbian Political Science Association (SPSA) calls for papers for its Annual International Conference on Constitutionalism and Constitutional Design in Democratic Recession on 22-23 September 2018 in Belgrade.
2. The Peking University School of Transnational Law invites inquiries from experienced professors for visits of between five and ten weeks during AY 2018-19 to teach certain topic. Queries to be addressed to christiandpangilinan@gmail.com or cpangilinan@stl.pku.edu.cn.
3. The Minerva Center for the Rule of Law under Extreme Condition, the Aptowitzer Center for Risk, Liability and Insurance and the Center for Cyber, Law and Policy invites participants for a Symposium on ‘The Legal Challenges of Terror’, on 7 June 2018; details can be found here.
4. The Centre For Arab & Islamic Studies & Centre For Law, Arts & Humanities at the Australian National University invites abstracts for its conference titled “After the Rule: Interpreting Law in Comparative and Cross-Cultural Perspective” to be held on 21 September 2018.
5. The Australian Network for Japanese Law and the Asia Pacific Legal Institute of Australia, in collaboration with Bond University announced a call for papers for the 2018 Asian Law and Society Association conference.
6. Tristin Green, University of San Francisco; Angela Onwuachi-Willig, UC Berkeley; and Leticia Saucedo, UC Davis announce the Second Annual Equality Law Scholars’ Forum to be held in November 2018. Junior scholars are invited to submit abstracts of proposed papers, 3-5 pages in length, by July 1, 2018 to Tristin Green, USF School of Law at tgreen4@usfca.edu.
7. Northern Illinois University College of Law will host a Junior Scholars Works-in-Progress conference at Loyola University School of Law on October 5, 2018. Interested scholars are expected to submit a working title and abstract of 200-300 words to LeAnn Baie (lbaie[at]niu.edu) no later than June 15, 2018.
8. Católica Global School of Law presents the Graduate Legal Research Conference 2018, “The Future of Health Law” and abstracts are due by June 11, 2018.
9. The University of Wollongong School of Law‘s Legal Intersections Research Centre invites the submission of abstracts for the 37th Annual Conference of the Australia and New Zealand Law and History Society (ANZLHS), to be held December 12–15, 2018 in Wollongong, Australia. Abstracts of papers or panel proposals (of three to four papers) related to the theme of “Inclusion, Exclusion and Democracy”, which should be no more than 250 words must be submitted by July 6, 2018.
10. The AALS Sections on International Human Rights and Law and the Social Sciences invite papers for their program “Empirical Approaches to Human Rights Law and the Rise of ‘Indicators’” at the AALS Annual Meeting (January 2-6, 2019, in New Orleans, LA). Concept notes of 5-15 double-spaced pages with a summary of key ideas are due June 1, 2018.

Elsewhere Online

1. Tarunabh Khaitan, A Sinking, Slow and Steady, The Indian Express, 18 May 2018.
2. Gaurav Mukherjee, Symposium: Crisis at the Supreme Court of India? A Moment of Self-Reckoning for the Supreme Court of India? Reflections on the Judges’ Press Conference, International Association of Constitutional Law Blog, 17 May 2018.
3. Tomasz Tadeusz Koncewicz, The Białowieża case. A Tragedy in Six Acts, Verfassungsblog, 17 May 2018.
4. Michael Kirby, Minimum Core Obligations and the Right to Health: A Legal Analysis, James G. Stewart Blog, 17 May 2018.
5. Francis Young, “Packing” the Lords: Some Legal Reflections, UK Constitutional Law Association Blog, 16 May 2018.
6. Jongcheol Kim, Presidential Proposal for Constitutional Revision in South Korea: Unlikely to be Passed but Significant Step Forward, Constitution Net, 16 May 2018.
7. Patrick Utz, Federal reforms in Austria: is now the time to overcome gridlock?, The Constitution Unit, 15 May 2018.
8. Ronald Collins, Ask the Author: “We the Corporations: How American Businesses Won Their Civil Rights”, SCOTUS Blog, 15 May 2018.
9. Chiara Graziani, UK-EU Intelligence Information Sharing after Brexit, DCU Brexit Unit, 15 May 2018.
10. Alon Harel, The Israeli Override Clause and the Future of Israeli Democracy, Verfassungsblog, 14 May 2018.
11. Zoltán Fleck, Judges under Attack in Hungary, Verfassungsblog, 14 May 2018.
12. Dennis Altman, A radical thought: could constitutional monarchies be important aids to democracy?, The Conversation, 13 May 2018.
13. Shubhankar Dam, Why the Supreme Court has only itself to blame for the recent unsavoury episodes, Economic Times, 13 May 2018.
14. Freedom House, Nations in Transit Report 2018, Freedom House, 2018.
15. Martha Nussbaum, Minimum Core Obligations: Toward A Deeper Philosophical Inquiry, James G. Stewart Blog, 11 May 2018.
16. Tom Gerald Daly, Report: An African Judicial Network: Building Community, Delivering Justice, International Association of Constitutional Law Blog, 6 May 2018.
17. Amia Srinivasan, More Equal Than Others (reviewing Jeremy Waldron’s ‘One Another’s Equals: The Basis of Human Equality’), The New York Review of Books, 19 April 2018.

—Jaclyn L. Neo, National University of Singapore Faculty of Law

[Editor’s note: This is one of our biweekly I-CONnect columns. Columns, while scholarly in accordance with the tone of the blog and about the same length as a normal blog post, are a bit more “op-ed” in nature than standard posts. For more information about our four columnists for 2018, see here.]

A new alliance is in power. In Malaysia, the Barisan Nasional / National Front Alliance, which has been in power since the country became independent in 1957, spectacularly lost the General Elections held on 9 May 2018. Angered by persistent stories of corruption and incompetence, as well as frustrated by economic issues such as rising costs of living, the imposition of a Goods and Services Tax, stagnant salaries, lack of job opportunities, and a weakened currency, an estimated 82% of voters turned out in droves to rebuke the incumbent government.

In what has now been called the “Malaysian tsunami”, Barisan Nasional lost almost half of its seats in the federal Parliament, lost control over all but three state governments in the federation, and won a mere 36% of the popular vote. This was a radical fall from its share of the popular vote at 47.37% in the last General Elections in 2013, and from its highest at 65.5% in 1995. It won only 79 seats in the federal Parliament, out of 222. In contrast, a new coalition of four political parties led by former Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad,[1] Pakatan Harapan (the Hope Alliance) (“PH) won 47.3% of the popular vote and control over 122 seats in the Federal Parliament. This is 10 more than the 112 seats needed to form a simple majority in Parliament.[2]

The election was a demonstration of people’s power to assert their democratic voice, despite a whole slew of attempts to try to suppress the vote. These included setting polling day in the middle of the work week; not updating the electoral register to allow voters who registered after January 2018 the right to vote; and finally, requiring overseas voters to mail back their ballots within a short campaigning period of 11 days. These attempts further angered voters, galvanising many to assert their democratic right at the ballot boxes.

However, even before the celebrations could start, the political intrigue had thickened. There was news of delay in Mahathir’s appointment by the constitutional monarch, the Yang di-Pertuan Agong, which the latter denied in a statement. When Mahathir was eventually summoned the day after the elections, the swearing in ceremony was delayed and finally took place in the late evening. There was understandably some anxiety over this as entrenched political parties sometimes refuse to give up power to make way for peaceful political transitions.[3] When the leader of BN, the former Prime Minister, cryptically claimed that no single party had won the majority of seats in parliament, there were serious concerns that BN might try to fight the vote.

Read the rest of this entry…

–Nausica Palazzo, Ph.D. researcher in Comparative Constitutional Law (University of Trento)

In this weekly feature, I-CONnect publishes a curated reading list of developments in public law. “Developments” may include a selection of links to news, high court decisions, new or recent scholarly books and articles, and blog posts from around the public law blogosphere.

To submit relevant developments for our weekly feature on “What’s New in Public Law,” please email contact.iconnect@gmail.com.

Developments in Constitutional Courts

1. The Spanish Constitutional Tribunal suspended the law permitting the Catalan parliament to vote in Puigdemont in absentia.
2. The Constitutional Court of Moldova ruled that the cancellation of pension payments to persons establishing their domicile abroad, who contributed to the pension system, is unconstitutional.
3. The Brazil Supreme Court limited MPs’ jurisdiction privileges due to the high caseload.
4. The Constitutional Court of Croatia upheld a law aimed at shielding the economy from the crisis of Croatia’s largest private company.
5. The Israel Supreme Court President expresses concerns over a recent bill that would limit the independence of the judiciary.

In the News

1. The Polish President set the date for a consultative referendum on prospective constitutional amendments.
2. The Philippine Supreme Court removed one of its judges, and main opponent of Duterte’s reforms, for failure to disclose wealth.
3. The president of Moldova announced amendments to the constitution aimed at transitioning to a presidential government.
4. The new President of Myanmar pledges to amend the nation’s military-drafted constitution.
5. Italy’s anti-establishment parties, 5-Star Movement and League, enter a second round of talks to jointly form a government.
6. The Supreme Court of Equatorial Guinea upheld the dissolution of the opposition party Ciudadanos por la Innovación.

New Scholarship

1. Anne Twomey, The Veiled Sceptre – Reserve Powers of Heads of State in Westminster Systems (Cambridge University Press 2018) (examining exercises of the discretionary or ‘reserve’ powers of heads of state in countries including Australia, Barbados, Canada, Fiji, Grenada, India, Malaysia, New Zealand, Pakistan, Papua New Guinea, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Sri Lanka, Tuvalu, the United Kingdom and Vanuatu)
2. Brian Christopher Jones, The rule of law in UK public law textbooks: from critique to acceptance?Public Law (forthcoming) (surveying UK public law textbooks to demonstrate how the rule of law often received curt and highly critical coverage in the 20th century, but now receives expansive and mostly accepting coverage)
3. Aydin Atilgan, Global Constitutionalism: A Socio-Legal Perspective (Springer, 2018) (casting doubt on the use of the “global constitutionalism” paradigm as a viable alternative paradigm for international law)
4. Chad Damro, Sieglinde Gstöhl, Simon Schunz, The European Union’s Evolving External Engagement Towards New Sectoral Diplomacies? (Routledge, 2018) (reporting the expansion of the EU’s external policy portfolio towards new areas such as competition, energy, the environment, justice and home affairs or monetary governance but also gender, science, culture or higher education)
5. Kheinkor Lamarr, Jurisprudence of Minority Rights: The Changing Contours of Minority Rights, Proceedings of the 8th International RAIS Conference on Social Sciences (2018) (charting out the historic protection of minority rights under international human rights law).
6. Kerry Abrams, The Rights of Marriage: Obergefell, Din, and the Future of Constitutional Family Law, 103 Cornell Law Review (2018) (examining the main and most recent constitutional family law decisions in the United States, included the overlooked Din decision)
7. Aniceto Masferrer (Ed.), The Western Codification of Criminal Law: A Revision of the Myth of its Predominant French Influence (Springer, 2018) (offering a critical assessment of the influence of the French model on European and Latin American criminal codes)

Calls for Papers and Announcements

1. The European University Institute welcomes applications to the Summer School “Introduction to Teaching in Higher Education,” a 4-day workshop that will introduce participants to the theory and practice of teaching in Higher Education. The summer school is held on July 4-9, 2018, in Florence, Italy. Applications are considered on a first-come, first-serve basis.
2. The AALS Sections on International Human Rights and Law and the Social Sciences invite submissions for their program “Empirical Approaches to Human Rights Law and the Rise of ‘Indicators’” at the AALS Annual Meeting, to be held on January 2-6, 2019, in New Orleans, LA.
3. The International Journal for the Semiotics of Law has launched a call for papers for its special issue “Hungarian Language and Law: Developing a Grammar for Social Inclusion, a Vocabulary for Political Emancipation.” The submission deadline is June 30, 2018.
4. The American Branch of the International Law Association (ABILA) and the International Law Students Organization (ILSA) invite submissions to the International Law Weekend 2018 on “Why International Law Matters,” to be held October 18-20, 2018, in New York. More information can be found here.
5. The new issue of the European Journal of International Law (Vol. 29, No. 1) is
6. The Emory University School of Law in Atlanta will host a conference on “Vulnerability and the Social Reproduction of Resilient Societies” on May 29–31, 2018. Here is the link to the registration.
7. The University of Oxford, Faculty of Law has an opening for the Professorship of Intellectual Property and Information Technology Law in association with St Peter’s College. The deadline for applications is May 30, 2018.
8. The Faculty of Law, Economics, and Finance (FDEF) of the University of Luxembourg has an opening for one Professor of Capital Markets and Post-Trade. The deadline for the application is June 10, 2018

Elsewhere Online

1. Arianna Vedaschi, State Secrecy in Counterterrorism: Different Judicial Standards of Review – The Abu Omar Case before Italian Courts, Verfassungsblog
2. Sioudina Mandibaye Dominique, Reforming the Content, Rather than Context, of the Chadian Constitution: Old Wine in a New Bottle?, ConstitutionNet
3. Nicholas Bagley, There’s No Justification for Michigan’s Discriminatory Work Requirements, Notice & Comment Blog
4. Michael Albertus and Victor Menaldo, Why Are So Many Democracies Breaking Down?, The New York Times
5. Rishabh Bajoria, Indian Supreme Court Waters Down Legislation Protecting Scheduled Castes and Tribes from Unlawful Discrimination, OxHRH Blog
6. Gianfranco Baldini, Andrea Pedrazzani and Luca Pinto, How Italy experienced (yet another) electoral system and why it may soon change it again, The Constitution Unit
7. Jack Sheldon, The UK-Welsh agreement on Brexit and devolved powers, and why it matters for the UK as a whole, Blog of the Centre on Constitutional Change
8. Henna Bagga, Higher Education Is a Human Right, JURIST
9. Sarah Keenan, The Blurring of Australian and Nauruan Jurisdiction, Blog of the IACL, AIDC
10. Sofia Ranchordás, Cities as Corporations? The Privatization of Cities and the Automation of Local Law, Admin Law Blog
11. Marcin Matczak, A Constitutional Referendum to Delegitimize the Constitution, Verfassungsblog