magnify

I·CONnect

Blog of the International Journal of Constitutional Law
Home Editorials Join I·CON: Debate!
formats

Join I·CON: Debate!

In our current issue we feature an I·CON: Debate! on strategic reasoning in the Israeli Supreme Court. In a landmark case, the Court decided to set a principle while delaying a concrete ruling until the legislature fleshes out particular legal arrangements in accordance with this principle. In the exchange, Haim Sandberg and Barak Medina suggest different analyses and opposite evaluative accounts of the Court’s course of action.

We are happy to provide free access to this debate for I·CONnect readers and to invite you to join the debate in this forum. Click the titles to access the full-text papers:

Haim Sandberg, Strategic Considerations behind Normative Explanations: Lessons from Israel’s Supreme Court Expropriations Case

Barak Medina, Strategic Considerations behind Normative Explanations: Lessons from Israel’s Supreme Court Expropriations Case: A Reply to Haim Sandberg

Haim Sandberg, Strategic Considerations behind Normative Explanations: Lessons from Israel’s Supreme Court Expropriations Case: A Rejoinder to Barak Medina

Print Friendly
Published on September 30, 2013
Author:          Filed under: Editorials
 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *