magnify

I·CONnect

Blog of the International Journal of Constitutional Law
Home 2010 March (Page 2)
formats

More on Constitutional Concerns regarding EU Data Retention Directive

Readers will likely recall that the German Federal Constitutional Court earlier this month held unconstitutional a German law requiring the retention of certain telecommunication data (German decision here, German press reports in English here and here). The law that was invalidated transposed Directive 2006/24/EC, passed largely in response to the Madrid and London bombings, into

Read More…

 
formats

More on Constitutional Concerns regarding EU Data Retention Directive

Published on March 15, 2010
Author:          Filed under: Uncategorized
 
formats

New blogger

We’re delighted to welcome Claudia Haupt, the International and Comparative Law Fellow at George Washington University, as a blogger on the site. Claudia works on Germany and the EU, among other places. She received her first law degree from the University of Cologne and an LL.M., with highest honors, from GW. She also holds a

Read More…

Published on March 15, 2010
Author:          Filed under: Uncategorized
 
formats

Prime Minister Berlusconi vs. The Constitutional Court

Italian Prime Minister Sylvio Berlusconi has won the latest round in his continuing battle versus the Constitutional Court. Although his recent victory is far from decisive in the larger view, the Prime Minister has scored a significant point that will give him a much needed reprieve. Return for a moment to October 2009. It was

Read More…

Published on March 14, 2010
Author:          Filed under: hp, Italy, Richard Albert, Sylvio Berlusconi
 
formats

Kenya process: the next hurdle

Readers of this blog know that we have been following the Kenya constitution-making process with a close eye. This coming week, debate is to begin in the parliament over the revised draft produced by the Committee of Experts. That draft has been considered by the Parliamentary Select Committee for the past couple weeks. The signs

Read More…

Published on March 13, 2010
Author:          Filed under: abortion, hp, Kenya, Tom Ginsburg
 
formats

The ECtHR rules on Greek-Cypriots’ Right of Return; the ECJ rules on the Economic Treaty Status of Jewish Settlements

Two important rulings from Europe reinforce the increasing significance of supra-national quasi-constitutional regimes in dealing with international political hot potatoes. In a landmark ruling the ECtHR held last week (Demopoulos et al. v. Turkey)that Greek refugees who had fled northern Cyprus during the Turkish invasion in 1974 do not have an automatic, unqualified right of

Read More…

 
formats

South Korean Constitutional Court (barely) upholds the death penalty

By a 5-4 vote, South Korea’s Constitutional Court has upheld the constitutionality of the death penalty, per this report in the Hankyoreh. Notably, two of the justices in the majority called for legislative modification or abolition of the death penalty. The Korean Bar Association’s statement in response to the ruling describes “the prestige of the

Read More…

Published on March 11, 2010
Author:          Filed under: David Law, death penalty, hp, South Korea
 
formats

Weiler on the UK Supreme Court

The first issue of the Jewish Review of Books has just published an excellent critique by Joseph Weiler of the UK Supreme Court’s decision in the Jewish Free School Case (see our earlier posts here and here). The case held that the admissions criteria of the Jewish state-supported school, denying admission to a child whose

Read More…

Published on March 5, 2010
Author:          Filed under: hp, religion, Tom Ginsburg, United Kingdom
 
formats

German Privacy Decision

The Federal Constitutional Court in Germany has apparently reversed an anti-terror law that allowed authorities to keep information about certain telephone calls and emails for up to six months. The Court said this was a “grave intrusion” on privacy rights. 35,000 Germans supposedly joined in the appeal and the Court has ordered deletion of the

Read More…

Published on March 4, 2010
Author:          Filed under: Mark Kende hp
 
formats

When Should Supreme Court Judges Retire?

India is the latest state to debate the proper age at which Supreme Court justices should retire. At present, Indian Supreme Court Justices retire at age 65. The current proposal would raise the age of retirement by three years to 68. The Government of India, speaking though the Minister for Law, Justice and Company Affairs, has

Read More…

Published on March 1, 2010
Author:          Filed under: hp, India, retirement, Richard Albert, Supreme Court justices