magnify

I·CONnect

Blog of the International Journal of Constitutional Law

Symposium |Constitutional Struggles in Asia | Part I | Drifting Between Democracy and Despotism in Sri Lanka

[Editor’s Note: In light of recent constitutional (or some may say, unconstitutional) developments, I-CONnect is pleased to feature this timely symposium examining constitutional struggles in Asia. This introduction will be followed by five posts exploring and contextualizing constitutional struggles in five countries in Asia.]


Mario Gomez, Executive Director, International Centre for Ethnic Studies, Sri Lanka

Sri Lanka once more, entered the fold of constitutional authoritarianism with the passage of the 20th Amendment to the constitution in October 2020. Its democratic spring of 2015 did not endure, as internal squabbles within the previous ruling coalition resulted in ineffective governance, a constitutional crisis, and a serious breach of national security. This resulted in the coalition being voted out of power, first in the Presidential elections of 2019 and then in Parliamentary elections in August 2020, with a new regime taking control of state power.  One of the first acts of the new government was to pass the 20th Amendment, which returned the country to a hyper-Presidential system with power centralized in a powerful elected Executive President.

Read the rest of this entry…
Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Published on February 20, 2021
Author:          Filed under: Analysis
 

Symposium on Constitutional Struggles in Asia: Introduction

[Editor’s Note: In light of recent constitutional (or some may say, unconstitutional) developments, I-CONnect is pleased to feature this timely symposium examining constitutional struggles in Asia. This introduction will be followed by five posts exploring and contextualizing constitutional struggles in five countries in Asia.]


Dian A H Shah (National University of Singapore), Andrew Harding (National University of Singapore), and Jonathan Liljeblad (Australian National University)

The military coup in Myanmar early this month may well serve as a warning of what might unravel in Asia in the months and years to come. Although, to be sure, not all countries face the threat of military coups, there is an unmistakable wave of constitutional strains and struggles that are threatening the very foundation of legal and governance systems in many Asian jurisdictions. By “struggles” we do not mean to refer to mere gaps between constitutional law on the books and constitutional law in practice – it is not just about the day-to-day decisions or actions that test the boundaries of constitutional limits on government power. Rather, they are recurring issues that strike at the heart of the constitutional fundamentals of a particular country. Whether it is the resurgence of authoritarianism, the revival of monarchical authority, or even the recalibrating of majority-minority dynamics in the constitutional arrangements of ethnically divided societies, many countries in Asia are experiencing some degree of volatility and unpredictability in defining the fundamental values and principles that underpin their nation-state. These are not simply disagreements about constitutional practice or interpretation; rather, those involved in the constitutional struggle are seeking to capture and rechart the path of the constitutional order to achieve a range of objectives.

Read the rest of this entry…
Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Published on February 19, 2021
Author:          Filed under: Analysis
 

Militant Democracy in America

Miguel Schor, Drake University Law School

Comparative constitutionalism, long a backwater among American constitutionalists, is enjoying a resurgence as scholars seek to better understand Trumpism and what it might portend for American democracy. The term autogolpe began to trend when a mob attacked the Capitol after Trump, who knows little about Henry II or Thomas Beckett, harangued his followers to do something about the troublesome congressional certification of the electoral college vote. The term autogolpe is borrowed from the long experience of Latin America with presidents who circumvent institutional restraints to enrich themselves and their cronies. Corrupt demagogues lack a retirement plan and consequently have good reasons to seek to overturn elections to avoid accountability.

Militant democracy is the other comparative constitutional concept that has come into prominence. It is borrowed from German constitutionalism. The idea underpinning militant democracy is that a liberal democracy may take illiberal measures—such as limiting speech and political parties—to prevent anti-democratic forces from using democratic means to overthrow democracy. This, of course, is the path Hitler took to power in Germany. Militant democracy was baked into Germany’s constitutional order as a solution to this particular vice of democracy. Versions of this idea then spread around the globe for functional reasons. Contemporary democracies are more likely to die at the hands of politicians and kleptocratic captains of industry than the military.

Militant democracy as a limit on who may participate in politics has taken a few uncertain steps in the United States. Donald Trump’s second impeachment was obviously not aimed at removing Trump from office but about launching a discussion among American citizens that demagogues are unfit to hold an office of “honor, trust, or profit under the United States.” The attempt to expel Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, whose political views are deeply antithetical to democracy, provides another example of how militant democracy could be operationalized in the United States.

Read the rest of this entry…
Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Published on February 16, 2021
Author:          Filed under: Analysis
 

What’s New in Public Law


Bárbara da Rosa Lazarotto, Master Student at the University of Minho – Portugal; Researcher at the International Legal Research Group on Human Rights and Technology of the European Law Students Association – ELSA.


In this weekly feature, I-CONnect publishes a curated reading list of developments in public law. “Developments” may include a selection of links to news, high court decisions, new or recent scholarly books and articles, and blog posts from around the public law blogosphere. To submit relevant developments for our weekly feature on “What’s New in Public Law,” please email iconnecteditors@gmail.com.

Developments in Constitutional Courts

  1. The Supreme Court of the United States has ruled that the State of California cannot ban indoor church services amid the fight against the COVID-19 pandemic, however, restrictions on singing and chanting are allowed.
  2. The Constitutional Court of Slovenia announced that the parliamentary inquiry act and rules of procedure on parliamentary inquiry violate the Slovenian Constitution.
  3. The Constitutional Court of France has ruled that a law that was introduced by the French government to regulate 5G networks, also called “anti-Huawei law” are constitutional.
  4. The Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic has annulled some aspects of the electoral law that hurts smaller parties just eight months before elections. However, a survey has shown that the majority of Czechs are in favor of those decisions.
  5. The Supreme Court of Brazil in a 9-1 decision ruled that the right to be forgotten is not constitutional.
  6. The Constitutional Court of Bolivia has denied an appeal and confirmed that regional elections will take place on March 7, 2021.

In the News

  1. Ecuador held a presidential election this week. There are no official results yet about which candidates will run in a runoff election.
  2. This week the impeachment trial of former US President Donald Trump started in the United States Senate. On the first day of trial, the Senate found it constitutional.
  3. The Executive Branch of Peru has proposed a constitutional reform to modify article 93 of the Peruvian Constitution that would remove parliamentary immunity.
  4. The International Court of Justice announced that Judge Joan E. Donoghue and Judge Kirill Gevorgian were elected President and Vice-President of the Court respectively.
  5. Following the coup in Myanmar last week, the UN has asked for sanctions while protests rise in the country.

New Scholarship

  1. Catarina Santos Botelho, Antônio Carlos Efing, Leonardo Santos Cacau La Bradbury, Direito e seus desafios socioambientais e tecnológicos nas democracias contemporâneas (examining main socio-environmental and technological challenges of the law in contemporary democracies).
  2. Guiliano Amato, Benedetta Barbisan, Cesare Pinelli, Rule of Law vs Majoritarian Democracy (2021) (examining the tension between the principle of rule of law and democracy).
  3. Marcelo Neves, Constitutionalism and the Paradox of Principles and Rules: Between Hydra and Hercules (2021) (focusing on the paradoxical relationship between principles and rules from the perspective of systems theory).
  4. Yonatan T. Fessha & Karl Kössler, Federalism and the Courts in Africa (2021) (examining the design and impact of courts in African federal systems).
  5. Eric C. Ip, Hybrid Constitutionalism: The Politics of Constitutional Review in the Chinese Special Administrative Regions (2021) (examining the differences in constitutional jurisprudence of the apex courts in Hong Kong and Macau).
  6. François Chevrette, Herbert Marx, Han-Ru Zhou, Constitutional Law: Fundamental Principles: Notes and Cases (2021) (new edition of the 1982 publication, which aims to cover fundamental principles of Canadian Constitutional Law with updated notes and landmark judgments)

Calls for Papers and Announcements

  1. The International Society for Public Law – ICON.S has opened a call for nominations for its annual Book Prize.
  2. The Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology has opened applications for 2021 Ph.D. scholarships. The deadline for submission is March 31, 2021.
  3. The XXVII Latin American Constitutional Law Yearbook 2021 announced that law specialists, students, and all interested are welcome to participate in the Yearbook. The deadline for submission is April 30, 2021.
  4. The Centre for Fundamental Rights at the Hertie School announced its Second Annual Workshop on Research Methods in Fundamental Rights which aims to provide doctoral and early-career legal researchers with opportunities to reflect on diverse research methods in human rights research. The workshop will take place from 2-4 June 2021. The deadline for applications is March 1, 2021.
  5. The NUALS Constitutional Studies Review is inviting submissions for its forthcoming Volume 2. The subjects are India and comparative constitutional law, constitutional theory, and comparative politics. Submission is now open.
  6. The School of Law and Government of Dublin City University has opened applications for Ph.D. scholarship in 2021. The deadline for submission is March, 31, 2021.
  7. The Rule of Law for Latin America program of the Konrad Adenauer Foundation published the 2020 issue of its Latin American Constitutional Law Yearbook.
  8. The New York University Law Review has opened submissions for articles.
  9. The Danish National Research Foundation’s Centre of Excellence for International Courts welcomes contributions on the subjects related to International Courts. The deadline for submission is March 29, 2021.
  10. The European Yearbook of Constitutional Law – EYCL invites submissions for its fourth volume regarding the subject of the constitutional identity of the European Union. The deadline for proposals is June 1, 2021.
  11. The Faculty of Law of Bar-Ilan University has announced the international online workshop on Digital Governance in the Times of COVID-19. It will cover subjects such as the digitalization of legislature, online courts, and Human Rights in statistical modeling. The workshop will take place on February 17-18, 2021 registration is now open.
  12. The Center on Privacy & Technology at Georgetown Law has announced a ten-week summer 2021 position in Washington DC for graduate or law students that are interested in the subjects of privacy, technology, civil rights, and social justice.
  13. The Constitutional Studies Institute Carlos Restrepo Piedrahita of the Universidad Externado de Colombia is calling all interested to be a part of their Book Club. The first session starts on February 15, 2021.
  14. Runnymede Society’s 2021 Law and Freedom Conference registrations are open. The Conference will be held on March 12-13, 2021.
  15. The Journal NAD. Nuovi Autoritarismi e Democrazie: Diritto, Istituzioni, Società (New Authoritarian Regimes and Democracies: Law, Institutions, Society) has issued a Call for Papers for its next edition. Papers are accepted in English, French, Italian, and Spanish. More details here.
  16. The IACL Research Group on Social Rights will host its first event in its ‘New Scholarship Talks’ series by academics on their social rights scholarship on 16 February at 3 pm CET. The event will feature Dr. Katie Boyle (University of Stirling) discussing her new book Economic and Social Rights Law: Incorporation, Justiciability and Principles of Adjudication (2020) and Dr. Koldo Casla (University of Essex) as the discussant. The event will be moderated by Gaurav Mukherjee (Central European University).

Elsewhere Online

  1. Lorenzo Gradoni, Constitutional Review via Facebook’s Oversight Board, Verfassungsblog
  2. Julia Kapelańska-Pręgowska, Istanbul Convention in Poland – From Ratification to Unconstitutionality?, IACL-AIDC Blog
  3. Gurshabad Grover and Anna Liz Thomas, Notes From a Foreign Field: The European Court of Human Rights on Russia’s Website Blocking, Indian Constitutional Law and Philosophy
  4. Pierre de Vos, Our government could – and should – take steps to compel vaccinations in South Africa for the greater good, Constitutionally Speaking
  5. Shantanu Mishra, Inheritance Rights at bay: The story of Kashmiri half widows, Law and Other Things
Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Published on February 15, 2021
Author:          Filed under: Developments
 

ICON Volume 18, Issue 3: Editorial

Guest Editorial: Systemic racism and creative emotion—back to basics; Peer review—Institutional hypocrisy and author ambivalence; A modest proposal on zoom teaching; In this issue

We invited Iyiola Solanke, Professor of EU Law and Social Justice at the University of Leeds, United Kingdom, to write a Guest Editorial.

Systemic racism and creative emotion—back to basics

There are currently two viruses causing death and destroying lives around the world: one is coronavirus, the other is racism. There are many similarities: neither can be seen with the naked eye, yet victims recognize how they sound and feel—they experience the results of the infection; both are highly contagious and can pass from one person to another rapidly, often without recipients being aware that they have been infected; and both can maim and kill: think of George Floyd in Minnesota, USA, or Mikey Powell in the Midlands, United Kingdom, both killed through asphyxiation in police custody. Or Oury Jalloh, who mysteriously burnt to death in a German police cell. Like COVID-19, the virus of racism does not respect borders, and both are deadly.

The purpose of this Editorial is threefold: first, to consider racism in the 21st century in the context of legal approaches of the 20th century; second, to consider why racism endures despite over 50 years of this law; and third, to suggest the role of creative emotion in effectively tackling racism.

Read the rest of this entry…
Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Published on February 14, 2021
Author:          Filed under: Editorials
 

ICON’s Latest Issue: Table of Contents

Volume 18 Issue 3

Table of Contents

Editorial

Articles

Adiel Zimran, The theological value of autonomy

Symposium: From Promise to Retrenchment? On the Changing Landscape of Israeli Constitutionalism

Adam Shinar, Barak Medina, and Gila Stopler, From promise to retrenchment: On the changing landscape of Israeli constitutionalism

Ariel L. Bendor, The Israeli judiciary-centered constitutionalism

Alon Harel and Noam Kolt, Popular rhetoric, false mirroring, and the courts

Tamar Hostovsky Brandes, The diminishing status of international law in the decisions of the Israeli Supreme Court concerning the Occupied Territories

Hassan Jabareen, Can the Court normalize the exception in non-emergency cases? Palestinian cases before the Israeli Supreme Court

Barak Medina, Unintended consequences of prohibiting advocacy of hatred and regulating campaign finance: The weakening status of freedom of speech in Israel

Yofi Tirosh, Diminishing constitutional law: The first three decades of women’s exclusion adjudication in Israel

Symposium: Agunah

SL and JHHW, Agunah: The shackled wife in Jewish law

Ram Rivlin, The morality of “get-threats”: Withholding divorce as extorsion

Keshet Starr, To have and to hold: Emotional distress, divorce denial, and the politics of interspousal torts

Benjamin Shmueli, Sticks, carrots, or a hybrid mechanism: The test case of refusal to divorce

Pamela Laufer-Ukeles, Negotiating Jewish divorce

Michael J. Broyde, The effectiveness of (Rabbinic) prenuptial agreements in preventing marital captivity

Critical Review of Jurisprudence

Bell E. Josef, The legal supremacy of legislative initiatives in judicial proceedings: The Israeli lesson

Critical Review of Governance

Mekonnen Firew Ayano, Law and land conflict in emerging market economies: Ethiopia, 2014-2018

Review Essay

BJ Ard, The not-so-great transformation. Review of Julie E. Cohen, Between Truth and Power: The Legal Constructions of Informational Capitalism

Roundtable: Indian Constitutional Democracy

Michaela Hailbronner, Indian public law scholarship roundtable: An introduction

Rohit De, The Indian Constitution: Moments, epics and everyday lives

Madhav Khosla, Democracy and decolonization: How India was made

Ornit Shani, The long making of India’s Constitution: Letters from the past

Book Reviews

Tom Ginsburg, Mark D. Rosen, & Georg Vanberg (eds), Constitutions in Times of Financial Crisis (Stefanie Egidy)

Pau Bossacoma Busquets, Morality and Legality of Secession. A Theory of National Self-Determination (Pau Luque)

Barbara Havelková and Mathias Möschel (eds). Anti-Discrimination Law in Civil Law Jurisdictions (Francisca Pou Giménez)

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Published on February 13, 2021
Author:          Filed under: Editorials
 

Democracy on Hold? Framing the Debate on the BARMM Transition in the Philippines

Armi Beatriz E. Bayot, University of Oxford Faculty of Law

[Editors’ Note: This is one of our biweekly ICONnect columns. For more information on our four columnists for 2021, please see here.]

When the Bangsamoro Transition Authority (BTA) took over as interim government of the new Bangsamoro Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao (BARMM) in 2019, the BTA officials could not have foreseen that their tenure would coincide with a global pandemic. The BTA, which is led by the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF)[1]  had to deal with the complex project of government transition in the face of COVID-19, and this resulted in considerable delays in its efforts[2] in establishing a new BARMM according to the terms of the 2014 peace agreement[3] and the organic law.[4] A mid-term review of the BTA’s performance conducted by the Mindanao Peoples’ Caucus[5] shows that the appointed body[6] is in danger of failing to meet all its targets when its term expires in 2022 to make way for a regularly elected parliament. The BTA is charged with various transition tasks, including the enactment of priority legislation and the organisation of the bureaucracy, among others.[7]

The release of the mid-term review has raised the question of whether the transition period ought to be extended by three more years to give the BTA more time to deliver on its transition plan.[8] The BTA itself, through Chief Minister Murad Ebrahim, has called for such an extension.[9] Or at least this is how the debate on the matter has been framed in some circles: a choice between extending the transition period under an extended BTA term or placing the transition project in limbo.[10]

Yet there is no reason why a new, popularly elected parliament could not take over the transition project. The BTA has no special powers or qualifications under the law that makes it uniquely placed to deliver on this task. It exercises exactly the same powers that a regularly elected government would exercise.[11]

Read the rest of this entry…
Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Published on February 10, 2021
Author:          Filed under: Developments
 

What’s New in Public Law


Eman Muhammad Rashwan, Ph.D. Candidate in the European Doctorate in Law & Economics (EDLE), Hamburg University, Germany; Assistant Lecturer of Public Law, Cairo University, Egypt.


In this weekly feature, I-CONnect publishes a curated reading list of developments in public law. “Developments” may include a selection of links to news, high court decisions, new or recent scholarly books, and articles, and blog posts from around the public law blogosphere.

To submit relevant developments for our weekly feature on “What’s New in Public Law,” please email iconnecteditors@gmail.com.

Developments in Constitutional Courts

  1. Nepal’s Supreme Court has issued two contempt of court notices to caretaker Prime Minister K.P. Sharma Oli, demanding he explains why he mocked lawyers challenging his decision to dissolve parliament and call early polls.
  2. On Wednesday, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled against the heirs of Jewish art dealers in Nazi-era Frankfurt who sought to sue Germany in American courts over artifacts they say the dealers were forced to sell for a third of their value. The court said a federal law bars suits against foreign governments accused of expropriating their own citizens’ property.
  3. The U.S. Supreme Court decided 5-4 that federal courts can review an administrative board’s refusal to reopen a case in which it denied disability benefits to a railroad worker.
  4. The Constitutional Court of South Africa ruled that the Regulation of Interception of Communications and Provision of Communication-Related Information Act 70 of 2002 (RICA) is unconstitutional, to the extent that it fails to provide adequate safeguards to protect the right to privacy, as buttressed by the rights of access to courts, freedom of expression and the media, and legal privilege.
  5. The Czech Constitutional Court has announced a fundamental change in the electoral law, which will impact the autumn parliamentary elections. The additive quorum for coalition formation was abolished, as well as the method for distributing votes, which disadvantaged small parties in the current system. It will now be enough for coalitions consisting of several parties or movements to receive only 5 percent of the vote to get into the Chamber of Deputies.

In the News

  1. Myanmar’s military seized power on Monday in a coup against the democratically elected government of Nobel laureate Aung San Suu Kyi, who was detained along with other leaders of her National League for Democracy (NLD) party in early morning raids.
  2. The German Federal Prosecutor has appointed Dr. Angelika Allgayer as A Judge at the Federal Court of Justice. The Presidium of the Federal Court of Justice has assigned Dr. Allgayer to the XI Civil Senate, primarily responsible for banking and stock exchange law.
  3. Chief Justice of Papua New Guinea Sir Gibbs Salika has announced plans to separate the running of the National Court and Supreme Court.
  4. India has once again pressed for the devolution of power to the provinces under the 13th Amendment (13A) of the Sri Lankan Constitution and provincial councils’ system as a meaningful step towards better representation of the island’  ’s Tamil minority.
  5. In Pakistan, The National Assembly (NA) on Wednesday could not take up the motion for the passage of the Constitution (Twenty-sixth Amendment) Bill, 2020, amid the Opposition’s protest in the house. The bill mainly seeks Senate elections through an open ballot.

 New Scholarship

  1. Richard Albert, America’s Amoral Constitution, 70 American University Law Review 773 (2021) (explaining that the legitimacy of the United States Constitution is rooted in an amoral code structured around the peculiar value of outcome-neutrality)
  2. Conor Casey, ‘Common-Good Constitutionalism’ and the New Battle over Constitutional Interpretation in the United States, Public Law (Forthcoming, 2021) (offering a sustained scholarly analysis of the debate over Adrian Vermeule’s proposal on ‘common-good constitutionalism’ using explanatory and critical approaches)
  3. Brian Erickson, Second Amendment Federalism, 73 Stanford L. Rev. (forthcoming 2021) (contending that the right to self-preservation in the U.S. has evolved significantly from its common law origins, with different states adopting different standards, procedures, and definitions over time. This diversity makes it difficult to extract universal principles of self-defense law for purposes of shaping Second Amendment doctrine. Therefore, courts today should treat state policy regulating the instrumentalities of self-defense with a degree of deference)
  4. Katherine Kettering, Developing A National Strategic Plan to Address the Effects of Climate Change On Human Health, 22 DePaul J. Health Care L. (2021) (emphasizing the importance of implementing a comprehensive American national climate change action plan by advancing the understanding of how current initiatives and proposed legislation are working strategically to offset impending health risks, specifically within vulnerable populations)
  5. Tom Ginsburg, Aziz Huq, and David Landau, The Comparative Constitutional Law of Presidential Impeachment, 88 University of Chicago Law Review (2021) (illuminating the appropriate scope and channels of impeachment by providing a comprehensive description of the law and practice of presidential removal in the global frame through deploying large-N empirical analysis of constitutional texts, linked to data about democratic quality in the wake of successful and unsuccessful removal efforts, in order to understand the impact of impeachment on democracy)
  6. M.C. Mirow & Howard Wasserman (eds.), Painting Constitutional Law: Xavier Cortada’s Images of Constitutional Rights, Brill (2021) (analyzing the paintings and cases portrayed by artist Xavier Cortada of significant decisions by the Supreme Court of the United States, describing the law surrounding the cases and discussing how Cortada captures these foundational decisions, their people, and their events on canvas)

Calls for Papers and Announcements

  1. Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy, will organize a seasonal online school titled “EU Cries and Post-BREXIT Integration (Crossroads).” The deadline for registration is March 12, 2021.
  2. Centre for Criminal Justice and Human Rights at the School of law, University College Cork, Ireland, invites applications for a research assistant position on its project “Traveller Equality and Justice Project.” Informal inquiries can be made in confidence Dr Fiona Donson, CCJHR/Law School, Email: f.donson@ucc.ie.
  3. The UN International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals, the Hague Branch, seeks to hire a legal officer in its president’s office.
  4. National Constitution Center, the United States, will hold an online webinar on the topic “Revolutionary Prophecies: The Founders and America’s Future” on February 15, 2021. Registration is welcome here.
  5. The Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies is organizing an online webinar on “Testing Europe’s Democratic Legitimacy in the Covid-19 Crisis” on Tuesday, February 16, 2021. Registration is open here.
  6. Leiden University’s Institute of Security and Global Affairs (ISGA) is inviting applications for a full-time Assistant Professor position of War, Peace, and Justice. The closing date is March 20, 2021.
  7. Constitutionalism and Politics Working Group at European University Institute launched a call for papers for its conference “The Dust of Time? Towards a 21st Century Constitutionalism.” The conference is to be held October 7-8, 2021. Those interested in participating should send an abstract of their paper (around 300 words) by March 31, 2021, to constpol@eui.eu. The conference output is planned to be published in a journal or as an edited volume.
  8. The Cambridge Studies in Law and Society invites submissions for its 2021 Early Career Manuscript Workshop to be held on Monday, June 14, 2021. The series editors will select one or two outstanding early-career authors to receive supportive feedback and mentoring at this small and intensive workshop to ready their first book manuscripts for submission. The deadline for applications is March 1, 2021. Applications to be sent to Marianne Nield, mnield@cambridge.org.

Elsewhere Online

  1. Meg Russell FBA, Boris Johnson and parliament: misunderstandings and structural weaknesses, The Constitution Unit
  2. Rushdi Nackerdien, Voting in a pandemic: Lessons for elections in Africa in 2021, BROOKINGS
  3. Agnieszka Bień-Kacała, Using Shifting Narratives to Undermine Gender Equality: Comparative Insights from Hungary, Poland and Turkey, IACL-AIDC Blog
  4. Amy Howe, SCOTUS NEWS: Justices take immigration cases off February calendar, SCOTUSblog
  5. Sebastian Strangio, Myanmar’s Coup Was a Chronicle Foretold: The Military Brass Never Relinquished Control, Foreign Affairs
  6. Balingene Kahombo & Trésor M. Makunya, Some reflections on the harmonisation of business law in Francophone Africa and constitutionalism, AfricLaw
Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Published on February 8, 2021
Author:          Filed under: Developments
 

The Right to Science and the Pandemic: at the Crossroads of Law and Politics

Luísa Netto, Postdoc Visiting Fellow, Leiden University and Assistant Professor, Catholic University of Minas Gerais

The right to enjoy the benefits of scientific progress and its applications or merely the right to science is positivized as a human right in various international law instruments, such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR). The bindingness of this right in domestic legal orders can be grounded either directly on these international instruments with their distinct normative force or on domestic clauses which establish the reception of international norms. Besides, there are constitutions which explicitly enshrine relevant aspects of this broad right.

Read the rest of this entry…
Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Published on February 5, 2021
Author:          Filed under: Developments
 

Undemocratic Legislation to Undermine Freedom of Speech in Brazil

Ulisses Levy Silvério dos Reis, The Federal University of the Semi-Arid Region – UFERSA, and Emilio Peluso Neder Meyer, The Federal University of Minas Gerais

The 2018 general elections put the Brazilian political scenario in the center of the global debate on illiberal governments and democratic erosion. Jair Bolsonaro, a former Army officer who was a legislator for almost thirty years, won the election with a political platform based on, amongst other radical viewpoints, the glorification of the 1964-1985 dictatorship. The regime was responsible for numerous illegal actions against the opposition, such as extrajudicial killings, enforced disappearances and torture. A wide range of fundamental rights were ignored or breached in that period of time. The crimes against humanity that were committed are well documented in the files of the National Truth Commission. In addition, the regime enacted laws that facilitated its objectives of persecuting political opponents.[1]

The absence of true efforts on institutional reforms, an aspect of transitional justice, is a hallmark of the Brazilian transition.[2] Even with the Brazilian redemocratization in 1985 and the enactment of the 1988 Constitution, legislation previously adopted remained in force. The problem is that part of this array of acts and decrees is embedded in authoritarianism. The totality of the pre-1988 legislation, however, does not share those features. The National Tax Code and the Criminal Code, for example, are acts that were enacted long before 1988 and are generally in accordance with the current constitution. The situation is different, though, for other provisions, such as part of the Administrative Law statutes, the 1979 Amnesty Law, and provisions dealing with the Military Justice system. Yet, one of the main examples of a discrepancy is the National Security Law, approved by Act 7.170 of 1983.

From the beginning of Bolsonaro’s government, his aides initiated a process of persecuting critics using the National Security Law. The first Minister of Justice of the current government, Sergio Moro, the former federal judge that imprisoned ex-President Lula da Silva, was responsible for using this legislation in an unprecedented way, prompting 28 investigations. In 2020, with his replacement by André Mendonça, this metric increased and 51 investigations were launched on the basis of the National Security Law. When compared to the few uses of that legislation in the years before Bolsonaro’s administration, the numbers demonstrate a paradigm shift in Brazil.

Read the rest of this entry…
Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Published on February 3, 2021
Author:          Filed under: Developments